Comparison of images between a camera and a smartphone: Blurry, please!

“Why do you always carry a camera with you, Sven? You have a smartphone!” – “Yes, but even the built-in camera takes better pictures than a cell phone, Michael.” – “We want to see that first!” In the short version, this was the background for this test. In five cases, the two editors investigate the question of whether you still need a real camera, even though you always have a smartphone with you. In the first part of the camera and smartphone comparison test, the smartphones were surprisingly convincing. In the second part of the comparison, which included close-ups in broad daylight, she was more balanced. Now smartphones have to show if their portrait mode keeps what the manufacturers promised, or if there’s another applause from the cameras, as in the zoom comparison in Part 3.
  1. Subway station: wide angle with artificial lighting.
  2. Venus: close-up.
  3. Street scene: telephoto zoom in daylight.
  4. Monument: vertical position in broad daylight.
  5. Phantom head: Flash/night mode in very poor lighting.

Candidates for the test: Smartphones vs. Cameras

This is how the photo comparison test went

The two editors went on a photo safari together and captured the same decorations with their devices in automatic mode. This is really a first hitch for the Sven Camera Tester, who always has the idea of ​​a better than automatic setup and loves to have the right lens for every subject in his bags. No problem for Cell Phone Tester Michael – whack, it’s over. Comparison of the original images on the screens was critical to the evaluation.

See also  The computer appears to be configured correctly, but the device or resource is not responding

Part 4: Bokeh or selfie – the main thing is that it is well out of focus

Störtebeker’s statue in Hamburg’s HafenCity has neither curls nor glasses – yet there are clear differences in photos between his real bokeh and what smartphones calculate using object recognition.

One must think that the great differences in the bokeh effect – that is, a sharp subject against a blurry background – can only be accentuated by hair and glasses. These are often nerve points that the smartphone software has to nibble on when detecting things. Cell phones usually have to account for opacity. In many devices there are 3D assistants or sensors that support calculations with in-depth information, but in the end this only creates the illusion of bokeh.

Selfie camera vs smartphone test comparison

In addition to the calculated selfie, the iPhone also saves the original photo (on the left) and is therefore ideal for comparison.

Selfie camera vs smartphone test comparison

When you compare the details of the original photo (on the left) and the photo of your iPhone, you can see that not only is the background different, but the rest of the subject is also smoothed out and thus loses detail.

Selfie camera vs smartphone test comparison

With the camera, you have to know which aperture creates a blurry background, with smartphones this is done via portrait mode, which on some phones starts automatically as soon as a face is recognized.

Camera vs smartphone picture

iPhone 12 Pro Max Selfie Below we take a closer look at the specific sections.

Smartphone vs. Camera: Selfie

Portrait of Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra.

Portrait of Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra.

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max selfie

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max.

Selfie Panasonic Lumix TZ96

Panasonic Lumix TZ96.

Portrait of Canon EOS M50 Mark II

Canon EOS M50 Mark II.

Nikon D350 Portrait Picture

Nikon D3500.

Platz 1: Nikon D3500 (relative note: 1,0)

Nikon D3500 Portrait Photo

Selfie taken with Nikon D3500. Relative score on this test: 1.0.

Don’t let the brightness of the subject affect you. On the screen where it was evaluated, the image was very detailed, crisp, sharp, high contrast – and – hard to see in the photo department – with a well-blended background: the Nikon D3500 sets the standard for portraits. No smartphone can keep up, but other cameras can.

Platz 2: Canon EOS M50 Mark II (relative note: 1,0)

  • high image quality
  • Ease of handling
  • Autofocus is slower with 4K video
  • Medium microphone

Portrait of Canon EOS M50 Mark II

Selfie taken with the Canon EOS M50 Mark II. Relative score on this test: 1.0.

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s portrait is brighter, but ultimately the Nikon D3500 provides more detail. A tight second place leans on the top.

Platz 3: Panasonic Lumix TZ96 (relative note: 2,0)

  • High image quality in good light
  • Fast Responsive Autofocus
  • Severe loss of sharpness in low light

Selfie Panasonic Lumix TZ96

The image was taken with a Panasonic Lumix TZ96 camera. Relative score on this test: 2.0.

When it comes to photos, the Panasonic Lumix TZ96 can’t keep up with Canon and Nikon; Their pictures are less detailed. In addition, the smaller sensor ensures a clearer background thus reducing the bokeh effect. But Lumix is ​​definitely better and more accurate than a cell phone.

Platz 4: iPhone 12 Pro Max (relative note: 3,0)

  • Long battery life
  • Big OLED screen
  • A little heavy and heavy

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max selfie

Selfie taken with Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max Relative rating in this test: 3.0.

Among the mobile phones, iPhone 12 Pro Max captures the best selfie. It artificially blurs the background, but also works around the same theme. As a result, details become blurry, and the edges are less precise than on the cameras.

Platz 5: Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (relative note: 3,0)

Portrait of Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Selfie taken with Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra. Relative score on this test: 3.0.

In portrait photography, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has to admit defeat against the iPhone, at least in this hands-on test. However, the difference is not so great that we give a different score.

Platz 6: Galaxy S21 Ultra (relative note: 4,0)

  • Super screen – big, sharp, high contrast, ultra bright
  • Wi-Fi 6E
  • big and heavy
  • There is no memory card slot

Portrait of Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra

Selfie taken with Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra. Relative score on this test: 4.0.

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra creates the best edge on the topic of mobile phones, but it’s still blurry. Unfortunately, this also applies to Klaus Stortebecker, who is largely flattened on the statue.

Bouquet: Cameras beat smartphones

Selfie camera vs smartphone test comparison

Best Man: No matter how many tries – model Klaus sarcastically held the position and didn’t let anything bother her.

Real cameras don’t have to confuse what the subject is, what the background is and where exactly the boundaries extend: the photographer determines what level should be sharp, and the rest is blurred. So there are no “offset” edges. The larger the sensor, the greater the effect. The only thing left for smartphones with small sensors is digital assistance with object recognition.

Camera test comparing images with a smartphone

Größenvergleich der Bildsensoren: Nikon D3500 (23,5×16,6 mm), Canon EOS M50 Mark II (22,3×14,9 mm), Panasonic Lumix TZ96 (6,2×4,6 mm), Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (11,4×8, 6 mm), Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (9,6×7,2 mm), Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (6,9×5,1 mm).

Even the worst camera in the test conjured up a more detailed bokeh image than the iPhone, which performed the best among mobile phones. Even without hair, a number of errors were visible upon closer examination. The tip featured a smooth edge, very sharp in true bokeh. However, the digital effect on modern smartphones is so good that it mimics the desired look very well. As long as you don’t look closely (as we did in this comparison) and don’t compare the computed result to real optical bokeh, the smartphone results are very useful – especially with the top smartphone guild representatives assembled here.

Frank Mccarthy

<p class="sign">"Certified gamer. Problem solver. Internet enthusiast. Twitter scholar. Infuriatingly humble alcohol geek. Tv guru."</p>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top